As an attackman who thrives on quick movements and accurate shots, finding the right head is important. I was eager to get my hands on the STX Surgeon 1K weighing at 4.83 oz, and it didn’t disappoint. STX claims it’s their lightest and most durable head to date, and after putting it through the wringer, I am inclined to agree.

The first thing I noticed was the redesigned face shape. It gave me a feeling of enhanced control, making my feeds crisper and my shots more on target. The maximum offset is a game-changer, allowing me to get some power behind my shots without sacrificing accuracy. 

And let’s not forget ground balls. The Speed Scoop design made scooping them up a breeze, even in crowded situations. The Surgeon 1K is one of the best attack lacrosse heads for offensive players.

Pros:

• • Lightweight feel

• • Enhanced shooting accuracy

• • Great for ground balls

Cons:

• • Exclusively for attack-minded players

• • Higher price point

Gait has truly shaken things up with the Torq 3, and the first thing that caught my eye was the noticeably different face shape and overall design compared to the previous model. Weighing in at 4.5 ounces, this head feels incredibly light in hand, making it a dream for offensive players who rely on quickness and agility. 

The reduced weight translates to less energy expended during stick handling, allowing for quicker dodges and more deceptive feeds.

I found the wider face profile to be a major advantage, especially when operating around the crease. The immediate release and high-speed shooting capabilities are top-notch. The aggressive shape improves control during fast-paced offensive sequences, minimizing the chances of the ball getting knocked loose. 

The moderately angled and parallel sidewalls provided excellent ball retention. Even with constant pressure from defenders, the tighter channel kept the ball secure. During gameplay, I was able to cradle the ball through heavy traffic. 

While the lower walls offer minimal flex, which can sometimes result in slight rattling on off-centered hits, the Torq 3’s stiffness strikes a great balance. It’s stiffer than the Torq 2, but with a touch more flex than the Maverik Optik, giving it a durable feel.

Pros:

• • Lightweight and durable

• • Well-spaced sidewall holes for pocket customization

• • Wide face for easy catching

• • No spread on shots

Cons:

• • Lower walls offer minimal flex, which can sometimes result in slight rattling on off-centered hits

The Maverik Kinetik 3.0 is an exciting upgrade for offensive players, and I couldn’t wait to see how it compared to the Kinetik 2. The first thing I noticed was its slightly narrower face shape, which quickly became one of my favorites. 

What truly stands out about this head is its versatility; although it’s marketed for outside shooters, it excels at crease work and quick catch-and-shoot plays as well. The narrow channel keeps the ball snug, giving me the confidence I need when winding up for a shot or faking inside.

Manufactured with Duratuff material, the Kinetik 3.0 is stiff even under extreme conditions. It held up remarkably well in temperatures reaching 106°F. The curved scoop directs the ball smoothly into the pocket when battling for possession around the crease. 

Additionally, the Tension Lock feature allowed me to string a well-defined channel for maximum hold, while the shorter throat and dual screw holes kept everything securely in place without any wobble.

Pros:

• • Narrow profile for better control

• • Tension lock system for improved stringing

• • Warp resistant

• • Durable Duratuff material

Cons:

• • Less surface area for angled catching

• • Higher price point

Having used the ECD Mirage 2.0 for over two years, I can say it’s one of the most versatile heads on the market. Even three years post-release, it remains a top pick for attackers and offensive middies alike. The face is nicely pinched, making it perfect for players who need tight ball control in high-pressure situations.

While it does weigh in at 5.0 ounces, which is heavier than many heads, the durability of its high-quality plastic is impressive. I’ve put it through constant practice without significant wear and tear (just a few crease marks to show for it). The deep offset design not only enhances ball retention but also ensures a smooth release for both passing and shooting.

I purchased mine pre-strung and love how effortlessly it generates power for outside shots and step-down cranks. The pocket placement sits higher, giving me better control when shooting on the run. 

However, if you prefer a lower pocket for dodging or feeding from X, you might want to consider the Maverik Optik Force instead. Regardless, the stiffness of the top rail and the wider face significantly boost shooting speed while preventing any warping during gameplay.

Pros:

• • Durable and weather-resistant

• • Warp resistance

• • Offers a smooth release

Cons:

• • Heavier than some alternatives

• • Fewer sidewall holes for customization

Just recently released in June 2021, the Optik 3.0 is the newest elite attack head in Maverik’s popular Optik line. 

Compared to the Optik 2.0—which was previously our highest-rated attack head—the 3.0 has a shorter throat that gives you more control when one-handed cradling, more sidewall holes (20 on each side), and is a bit stiffer.

The Optik 3.0 has a tight pinch throughout most of the head, giving you more control when dodging and accuracy when shooting and passing.

The increased number of stringing holes, along with Maverik’s Tension Lock system, make this head super easy to string. 

With a low offset, the Maverik Optik 3.0 is great for low or mid-to-low pockets. If you prefer a mid-to-high pocket, however, you may be better off going with an alternative.

Overall, this is an amazing head for attackmen. It has a great face shape, is stiff, holds its shape well, and the shortened throat gives an advantage for one-handed cradling.

If you are looking to save some money, the Maverik Optik 2.0 is still one of the best attack heads currently available.

Pros:

• • Lightweight

• • Stiff & durable

• • Tight face shape

• • Shortened throat gives more control when one-handed cradling

Cons:

• • Not great for mid-to-high pockets

The STX Surgeon 900 checks in next on our list of the best lacrosse heads thanks to its light weight, narrow face shape, and stiff plastic.

It is one of the lightest lacrosse heads ever created, weighing in at only 4.4 oz. It is, however, surprisingly stiff for how light it is—mostly due to STX’s EnduraForm plastic which is one of the best on the market. 

With that being said, it’s not quite as stiff as some of the bulkier (and heavier) attack heads such as the ECD Rebel Offense.

Another great thing about the Surgeon 900 is that it has a narrow face shape throughout the head. It has a narrow pinch until about halfway up the head then starts flaring out towards the scoop which is still pretty narrow compared to other heads.

This makes it great for carrying the ball like so many attackmen do—whether that be dodging from X, coming in from the wing, or going down the alley from up top.

The last feature I’d like to touch on is the Speed Scoop that STX used on this head. It is great for picking up ground balls at all angles and slightly hangs over the top string holes, making sure that your strings don’t interfere with scooping.

Pros:

• • Extremely light

• • Narrow face shape

• • Great scoop

Cons:

• • Not as stiff as some alternatives

If you prefer an attack head with a slightly wider face shape, the StringKing Mark 2A is a superb option. 

It is pinched towards the throat but starts flaring out lower on the head than many other options. This gives it a leg up on catching while sacrifycing some hold depending on your string job.

It has a traditional offset towards the throat making it easy to string those low pockets that are great for one-handed cradling.

Another thing I love about the Mark 2A (like most StringKing heads) is that it has a TON of sidewall holes, letting you customize your pocket to your play style.

It is pretty stiff for being the second-lightest head on this list and should hold up well over the course of a season.

Finally, it has a flat scoop that is good for ground balls and contributes towards a quicker and more accurate release.

Overall, if you are looking for an attack head with great stringing versatility and a great strength-to-weight ratio, the Mark 2A is a solid choice.

Pros:

• • Many sidewall holes

• • Great scoop

• • Very light

• • Low offset helps w/ one-handed cradling

Cons:

• • Wider face than alternatives

The Gait Mustang is one of the most durable lacrosse heads for attack. After a year of hard games, checks, and face-offs, I am impressed with its durability. It’s incredibly stiff, and that hasn’t changed over time. 

Despite the stiff design, its aggressive scoop easily slides the ground balls in the pocket, even in rough conditions. I found the Gait Mustang to be extremely responsive on the field. The six top holes and 18 side holes allowed me to create a mid-high pocket, perfect for offensive middies.

Moreover, the wider face profile and slightly pinched-in side rails provided a sharp shooting accuracy. My shots were speedy and didn’t go off-center. I loved the passing accuracy, as I could easily feed teammates on the run without worrying about the miss. 

However, its chunky design makes it a bit heavier. So, if you prefer a lightweight and flexible head, pick the Stringking Mark 2A. 

Otherwise, it’s the best lacrosse head for intermediate and advanced mid-fielders and attack players who prefer durability, stiffness, and high-speed shooting. 

Pros

• • Aggressive scoop design for high-speed shooting

• • Durable and stiff

• • Many side holes for pocket customization

Cons

• • Heavy

In 2023, I loved the design and feel when I got my new Warrior Burn XP2-O lacrosse head. It has a wider face with a high pinch and flare, perfect for generating power. The face profile gave me much control over my shots and quick releases. 

Moreover, It’s super light and responsive, and the balance is spot on. I have gotten some serious power behind my shots with accuracy. 

The scoop design is unique, featuring a rounded shape with ridges and added diffusers. While it takes some adjustment, the rounded shape and diffusers make ground ball pickups smoother and protect the top strings from wear and tear. 

Using the 20 side holes, I strung up a mid-high pocket, and the ball sat perfectly in the pocket. It has a maximum offset with a nice and deep channel. Thus, I got maximum control while cradling, and the ball didn’t jump out of my pocket after every check. 

Moreover, Thermaloc+ material and X-TRUSS technology provide high-grade durability for elite attackers and midfielders. Although it lacks the flexibility for face-off battles, it’s one of the best lacrosse heads. 

Pros

• • SPINE TRACK design for consistent throws

• • Protecting diffusers and thermaloc+ built

Cons

• • Slightly expensive

• • Scoop design may cause trouble for beginners

Nike’s design team has never been short of ideas to improve lacrosse heads, and their latest entry, the Surge Elite, is no exception. With the brand’s popularity, it’s no surprise that reviews for the Nike Surge Elite lacrosse head have flooded social media. 

Many players have noted its combination of the Lakota 3 face profile and the aggressive scoop of the Vapor Elite. However, the real question remains: how does it perform on the field? After purchasing the Surge Elite, I was eager to find out if it truly delivers for attackers.

Weighing in at just 4.7 ounces, the Surge Elite is designed for both attackers and midfielders. It features a mid-high pocket that promises quick ball release and impressive shooting accuracy. The moderately stiff construction allows for excellent control and durability, which is essential during intense gameplay. 

The head boasts six top string holes and 18 sidewall holes, providing ample options for pocket customization to suit individual preferences.

In terms of performance, the Surge Elite excels in shooting accuracy, especially for long-range shots. The angled sidewalls help direct the ball smoothly during passes and shots, ensuring minimal spread. 

While its stiffness can be challenging for beginners, experienced players will appreciate its responsiveness and control during high-contact situations. The narrow throat design enhances ball security, making it easier to cradle while dodging defenders.

The durability of the Nike Surge Elite is impressive as well. Constructed with PowerForm material, it resists warping and maintains its shape even after aggressive use. The rounded scoop design allows for smooth ground ball pickups without requiring extreme angle adjustments, making it a reliable choice for players who frequently find themselves in tight spaces.

Despite its strengths, the Surge Elite does have a few drawbacks. The long break-in period may deter some beginners who are used to more flexible heads. Additionally, while it’s suitable for occasional face-offs, serious face-off specialists might prefer a head specifically designed for that purpose.

It’s a solid option for attackers and aggressive midfielders looking for a mix of accuracy, durability, and control on the field.

Pros

• • Accurate high-speed shooting

• • Durable PowerForm material construction

• • Weather resistant

• • Warp resistant

• • Plenty of sidewall holes for pocket customization

Cons

• • Long break-in period

• • Stiff for beginners

The Maverik Tactik 3.0 comes in as tied for first in our list of the best heads for middies—and for good reason. It’s one of (if not the) best all-around midfielder heads currently available.

The Tacktik 3.0 is light, very stiff, and has a ton of stringing holes that allow you to customize your pocket to your preferences.

The Tactik 3.0 is an upgrade on what was previously rated our top-rated midielder head in the Tactik 2.0. 

The 3.0 comes with Maverik’s CoreControl technology that distributes the weight to the most important parts of the head, giving you more control, increasing stiffness, and decreasing weight.

The third version of the Tactik has a level 3 bottom rail that makes it great for a mid/low to mid/high pocket—something that many middies prefer.

It has a great stiffness-to-weight ratio which makes it great for both offense and defense. Also, it has a great scoop that makes ground balls a breeze.

The Tactik 3.0’s face shape is more pinched than the Tactik 2.0’s face shape. It is tighter towards the throat but opens up towards the midpoint of the head like the old version did.

Overall, the Tactik 3.0 is a great choice for midfielders and I think you’ll be very happy with this head from Maverik if it’s what you decide to go with.

Pros:

• • Very stiff

• • Relatively light

• • A ton of sidewall holes

• • Great scoop

Cons:

• • Sidewall holes are a bit small

Unlike the older STX Stallion Omega, the 900 is much less prone to breaking and is much lighter—something that is especially noticeable when we tested shooting with the two heads.

In addition, compared to the Stallion 900, the 1K is stiffer and has better shape retention thanks to its improved EnduraForm plastic.

It still has STX’s Speed Scoop which is loved by many players because it’s great for ground balls but also has a slight lip the covers the top string holes so they don’t interfere when you’re scooping.

The Stallion 1K has a great face shape as well. It has a narrow pinch on the bottom half of the head and gradually opens up towards the scoop.

Though it only has an average amount of stringing holes, they’re placed well and you shouldn’t have any trouble getting your ideal pocket in it. It also has Innerlock technology that makes stringing on the inside rail easier and more secure.

The biggest downside of the Stallion 1K is that it’s not great for low or even mid-to-low pockets due to the offset being towards the middle to top of the head. Of course, this is really only a problem if you prefer low pockets.

Overall, the new Stallion 1K is an awesome option for middies, especially those that prefer higher pockets and like to shoot from outside/on the run.

Pros:

• • Stiff & durable

• • Speed Scoop is amazing

• • Lightweight

• • Great face shape

Cons:

• • Not great for low pockets

*Video for older STX Stallion 900

The Nike L3 is the most recently released head on this list and is one of the best. It’s already one of the top choices among college midfielders throughout the nation.

The newest head in the popular Lakota line has a smooth face shape that isn’t too pinched, making it a great option for offensive middies, D middies, and LSMs alike. 

We’ve found the L3 to be extremely easy to string up despite it only having an average number of sidewall holes. The wider face shape and smooth flare definitely contribute to this.

In addition, the offset is towards the middle of the head, making it great for anywhere from a mid/low to mid/high pocket.

The only real drawback of this head is that it’s not the best for those who prefer very tight face shapes. If you fall into this boat, you may want to check out the Maverik Kinetik 2.0 (see below) or the ECD Mirage 2.0.

Overall, you won’t be disappointed if you go with the Nike L3. It’s a versatile head and we expect to see if on college lacrosse fields throughout the nation for the 2023 season.

Pros:

• • Very lightweight

• • Easy to string

• • Stiff

• • Good for a variety of positions

Cons:

• • Wider face shape than alternatives

ReLax has made a name for itself by providing lacrosse heads that cater to both elite players and those on a budget. With the launch of the RC1 lacrosse head, they’ve introduced an affordable option that aims to deliver performance without breaking the bank. 

Weighing in at 4.9 ounces, the RC1 is designed for transition and offensive midfielders. Its mid pocket location offers a good balance of control and quick ball release, making it suitable for both beginners and advanced beginners. 

The average stiffness of the head provides flexibility while maintaining durability, which is essential for players still developing their skills. 

With six top string holes and 23 sidewall holes on each side, the RC1 allows for ample customization to suit individual preferences.

In terms of shooting accuracy, the RC1 performs well for short-range passes, but it can struggle with long-distance shots due to its lower speed. The wider face shape helps with catching high-speed passes, making it ideal for players who are still refining their catching skills. 

However, cradling can be a bit challenging in tight situations, as the ball can pop out with minor mistakes.

Ground ball pickups are another strong point for the RC1. Its design allows for efficient scooping, though some players may find it less effective during face-offs due to its wider face profile. 

The head’s construction is durable enough to withstand checks without losing its shape, making it a reliable choice for players who frequently engage in physical play.

It’s a good option for those looking for an affordable head that doesn’t compromise too much on performance. While it may not be the best choice for advanced players or face-off specialists, it serves as an excellent entry-level option for beginners.

Pros

• • Budget-friendly price

• • Suitable for all-rounder positions

• • Good balance between flexibility and stiffness

• • Numerous side holes for customized stringing

Cons

• • Mesh quality could be improved

• • Average cradling hold

• • Not ideal for face-offs

The Nike CEO 3 lacrosse head has made waves in the lacrosse community, touted as the most durable face-off specialist head in 2023. Building on the success of its predecessor, the CEO 2, this head features a stiffer build, a shorter throat, and a zero-friction scoop designed to enhance performance. 

After putting it to the test, I’m here to share whether these upgrades translate into improved shooting speed and ground ball pickups or if it’s merely a cosmetic enhancement.

Weighing 4.9 ounces, the CEO 3 is engineered for face-off specialists and midfielders who demand both durability and performance. The mid pocket location allows for quick ball release, while its slightly wide face shape aids in catching and control. 

With four top string holes and 16 sidewall holes, customization options are plentiful, making it easier to customize the pocket to individual preferences.

In terms of shooting accuracy, the CEO 3 excels. I found that it delivered impressive passing accuracy for short-range shots, though long-range performance was somewhat compromised. 

The stiffer sidewalls provide excellent feedback during shots and passes, ensuring that the ball stays centered and minimizing unwanted movement. This design feature enhances shooting ability under pressure, making it a reliable choice for competitive play.

Catching high-speed passes was also a strong point for this head. The narrow throat design keeps the ball snug during dodges and checks, allowing for secure cradling even in tight situations. 

However, I did find the throat edges to be somewhat uncomfortable at times, which could be a drawback for players who prefer a more forgiving feel.

When it comes to checking, the CEO 3 performs exceptionally well. Its durable construction allows for powerful checks without compromising control or stability. I experienced minimal wear and tear after rigorous use, which speaks to its durability in high-contact scenarios. 

The zero-friction scoop design aids in ground ball pickups, making it easy to snag loose balls during play.

It’s an excellent choice for face-off specialists and midfielders looking for a balance of durability and performance on the field.

Pros

• • High durability

• • Sharp shooting accuracy and speed

• • Strong side rails with multiple holes for pocket customization

• • Versatile for midfielders and face-off specialists

Cons

• • Long break-in period

• • Uncomfortable throat edges

• • Less flexible for beginners

STX’s newest defensive lacrosse head—the Hammer 1K—comes in as the best option on this list due to its unmatched stiffness and durability. 

It improved upon our previously top-ranked defense head in the Hammer 900 with its increased stiffness and shape retention thanks to improved EnduraForm plastic.

It also doesn’t seem like it will have any of the same issues with breaking frequently that the older Hammer Omega had.

The STX Hammer 1K has a nice face shape for both defensemen and LSMs. It is pretty pinched towards the throat but gradually widens towards the scoop, giving it good ball control but still being wide for intercepting passes and laying checks.

As far as the offset goes, it is pretty high up on the head, making it great for a mid/high to high pocket, which is typically the preference for defensemen.

The Hammer 1K also has STX amazing Speed Scoop that is specifically designed to perform better on long poles. This makes ground balls a breeze and the InnerLock technology makes stringing easier and keeps your strings tighter.

The biggest downside is that there are only 15 sidewall holes on each side. While I haven’t ran into any issues with stringing it, if you prefer more sidewall holes, you may want to look elsewhere.

Overall, the new STX Hammer 1K is a great option for any D player—including close defenders and LSMs. It should hold up well for even the hardest of checkers and perform well in transition. 

Pros:

• • Very stiff

• • Durable

• • Great scoop

• • Nice face shape

Cons:

• • Fewer sidewall holes than competitors

The StringKing Mark 2D checks in as a very close second on our list of the best lacrosse heads for defense—and for very good reason.

It is the lightest head to make this list at an impressive 5.2 oz. Even better, unlike many other light heads, it has above-average stiffness and durability.

We’ve found that the scoop on the Mark 2D is great for ground balls. Its sharp angle, along with the dramatic forward cant shape of the head, allow you to easily scoop balls even when your butt end is still high in the air.

The head shape and numerous stringing holes make it easy to string a high pocket with good hold and smooth release. Like most other StringKing heads, the Mark 2D strings up beautifully and the range of pocket options is limitless.

The Mark 2D also has a locking bolt mechanism in the throat that helps secure your head more than just a traditional screw helping to eliminate head rattle and movement during checks.

Overall, this is a great head for both defensemen and LSMs due to its light weight, stiffness, face shape, and scoop design.

Pros:

• • Very light

• • Above-average stiffness

• • Great scoop design & head shape for ground balls

• • Tons of stringing holes

Cons:

• • Hard to string a low pocket in it

The Maverik Havok is one of the most popular LSM heads on the market today. 

It has a tighter pinch towards the throat than many competitors but opens up towards the scoop. 

We found a Havok strung up with a nice mid to mid/high pocket with a tight channel gives great hold and a smooth release.

The Havok it decently stiff but not as much as some more traditional defensive heads. It is, however, lighter than a lot of those options since it isn’t as bulky.

The Havok also has the Ground Control scoop that has a sharp angle making it easy to snag ground balls without having to get your butt end close to the ground. The way the top half of the head cants forward also helps with scooping balls.

If you are an LSM, D middie, or defenseman who likes to push transition, the Havok is a great option due to its face shape, light weight, and scoop. 

More traditional defensive players who prefer a wider, stiffer head may want to look at other alternatives as the STX X20 or Maverik Tank 2.0.

Pros:

• • Face shape helps give more control in transition

• • Great for ground balls

• • Relatively light

Cons:

• • May take getting used to for D players used to wide heads

• • Not as stiff as some D heads

As a close-defense player, I need a head that can withstand the game’s physicality while providing me with the tools to shut down opposing attackers. The ECD Delta lacrosse head has delivered it.

The stiffness of 2024’s ECD Delta is immediately noticeable which provides a solid feel when checking. I delivered powerful checks that consistently popped the ball out of my opponent’s sticks. 

The X-shaped sidewall struts add to the durability. Hence, I have had no issues with the head holding up to rough practice and games. They also contain 18 side holes wide enough to customize the pocket with leather strings. 

Furthermore, the wider face and tighter throat design allow me to intercept passes, keep the ball secure, and prevent turnovers. I have observed much better control over the ground ball when cradling and passing. 

However, the Delta’s stiffness can be a drawback, as it may limit ball control in traffic compared to more flexible heads. Therefore, I needed to be more deliberate with my movements when cradling. Yet, it improved after the break-in period. 

Pros

• • Stiff and durable design

• • It doesn’t warp on strong checks

• • Smooth ground ball pickups for get-and-go. 

Cons

• • Minimal spread on long shots

• • Limited ground ball control in traffic

The next best lacrosse head on my list is the Warrior Burn XP2-D. Weighing only 5.6 ounces, XP2-D is a highly stiff and durable lacrosse head of 2024. Thanks to its lightweight yet durable thermalock hybrid build. 

The XP2-D’s ability to maintain its shape in intense weather without bending or deforming ensures consistent performance throughout the game. 

Its wider throat design improved my checking ability. I can easily deflect shots and clear the ball from the defensive zone. In addition, the steeper face helped me easily cradle after scooping up ground balls. 

Compared to XP2-O, the defense version has a deeper pocket, which prevents the ground balls from bouncing out. The recessed stringing holes protect strings from wear and tear while maintaining a stiff pocket. 

The only thing that makes it second best is the rounded scoop. I often had to adjust my angle more than I would with a more aggressive scoop design. So, if you transition between offense and defense, ECD Delta would be a better choice.

Pros

• • Durable and weather-resistant

• • Perfect Offset for consistent performance

• • Minimal impact on checking 

Cons

• • The pocket needed minimal break-in time

• • Scoop design is not good for offensive middies

The Maverik Tank 2.0 is a robust addition to the lacrosse gear lineup, specifically designed for defense players who prioritize durability and performance.

Following the success of its predecessor, the Tank 2.0 has been engineered to withstand the rigors of defensive play while providing excellent ball control and ground ball pickups.

Weighing in at 5.5 ounces, the Tank 2.0 is built for defensemen who need a head that can handle aggressive checks and physical play. Its low pocket location allows for quick ball releases, while the moderately stiff construction provides a solid feel during gameplay. The head features six top string holes and 20 sidewall holes, offering ample customization options for stringing preferences.

In terms of shooting accuracy, the Tank 2.0 performs admirably for defensive players. The design allows for precise passes and quick releases, making it effective for clearing the ball and transitioning from defense to offense.

The moderately wide face shape aids in catching and controlling the ball, ensuring that defenders can maintain possession even under pressure.

Catching is another strong point for this head. The Tank 2.0’s design helps secure high-speed passes, providing reliable responsiveness during fast breaks or when receiving feeds from teammates. However, players may find that its stiffness can make cradling a bit challenging in tight situations, especially when dodging opponents.

The checking performance of the Maverik Tank 2.0 is impressive, thanks to its durable construction. The head absorbs impact well during aggressive checks, allowing defenders to maintain control while delivering powerful hits without compromising their grip on the ball. Its sturdy sidewalls help resist wear and tear, ensuring longevity even after extensive use.

Ground ball pickups are smooth and efficient with Tank 2.0. The rounded scoop design allows players to scoop up balls quickly without needing to adjust their angle drastically. This feature is particularly beneficial during scrums or when fighting for possession in crowded areas.

Pros

• • Durable construction designed for aggressive play

• • Excellent ball control and quick release

• • Smooth ground ball pickups

• • Ample stringing options for customization

Cons

• • Stiffness may challenge cradling in tight situations

• • Heavier than some attack-focused heads

• • Not ideal for offensive play styles

The original STX Eclipse was one of the most popular goalie heads ever made. There’s a reason it was used by goalies of all levels for over 15 years.

The Eclipse 2 is an upgrade on this near-perfect design, and is now the most popular goalie head on the market. 

It is used by elite high school and college players as well as countless youth players across the nation.

The Eclipse 2 comes with a new throat that gives players a more comfortable and secure grip. STX also doubled the amount of stringing holes for increased stringing customization.

With its offset design, this head makes quick work of ground balls and throws crisp outlet passes.

The Eclipse 2 is also relatively lightweight but holds its stiffness well over time—even during those hot summer tournaments.

The Eclipse 2 is perfect for goalies of all levels and is our #1 recommended option.

Pros:

• • Stiffer than the original Eclipse

• • Upgrade ergonomic throat gives you more control

• • Plenty of stringing holes so you can customize your pocket

Cons:

• • Slightly heavier than some alternatives

• • More expensive than other options

StringKing entered the goalie head arena with the Mark 2G in early 2020—immediately vaulting it to the top of our goalie head rankings.

The Mark 2G is extremely light at under 11 oz but still features plenty of surface area and has good stiffness.

Like many other StringKing heads, the Mark 2G comes equipped with 42 sidewall holes creating limitless stringing options.

The head features a shortened low-profile throat. For players who prefer not to hold the throat of the head, this may be a great fit. 

Otherwise, goalies may find themselves using tape to make up for the lack of grip since it’s shorter and doesn’t have as much of an ergonomic design like the Eclipse 2 does.

This head is perfect for goalies who want to branch out from the mainstream goalie head brands and have complete pocket customization. The Mark 2G also comes with a 6-month warranty should it break.

Pros:

• • Extremely light

• • TONS of stringing holes

• • 6-month warranty

Cons:

• • Not much room for grip on throat

The Nemesis 2 was notorious for breaking on the sidewall. 

During my freshman year of college, I went through 3 of them which was extremely frustrating—especially considering how long it took me to get my preferred pocket for outlet passes.

Warrior seems to have addressed this issue by adding more struts along the sidewall of the Nemesis 3. 

All of my teammates and friends who use the Nemesis 3 haven’t had any issues with them breaking.

Warrior also shaved off 1.1 ounces on the Nemesis 3 compared to its predecessor, making it one of the lightest goalie heads on the market.

Warrior has done a great job turning what used to be a bulky and brittle head into a lightweight and reliable option for goalies of all levels.

Pros:

• • Stiff

• • Many stringing holes

• • Pretty light

Cons:

• • No ergonomic throat design

Warrior Nemesis Lite is the most reliable lacrosse head for goalies from my 2023 collection. It weighs only 11.4 ounces but has very stiff rails and a durable design. 

The rugged sidewall design maintains its shape even against the fastest shots. These flared sidewalls are designed to channel the ball into the goalie’s pocket. I have saved 85% of shots aimed at the sides of the net. 

Moreover, it has a different face shape than the STX Eclipse. The Nemesis Lite is slightly bigger at its widest point but then is much more triangular with a narrower bottom to hold the stick. 

Its triangular face shape provides an unobstructed view of the field, allowing for quicker reactions. It also offers an increased catching area that reduces fumbles and dropped balls. 

Although the throat is a bit uncomfortable to hold, it has a perfect fix to the shaft. Hence, I didn’t face any rattles after catching a sharp throw. It also helped me improve my reflexes and deliver sharp throws. 

Pros

• • Large catching area

• • Stiff and lightweight 

• • Flared sidewalls to 

Cons

• • Uncomfortable throat end

STX Eclipse 3 has been my favorite goalie head of the year after Eclipse 2. After using the Eclipse 3 for several months in Division 1 lacrosse, the head stayed firm and didn’t flex. It results in more consistent saves when part of the head contacts the ball, even in hot conditions. 

STX has also refined the throat design, smoothing the little protrusion at the end. It has a narrower grip, allowing me a smooth transition from the shaft to the head. Its wings on the sides lock my hands, preventing the head from spinning when hit with a hard shot. 

The strut pattern is similar to the Eclipse 2 but updated. The Eclipse 3 weighs 15 ounces but feels lighter despite being stiffer. Although the bigger surface area and minimal impact simplify the goalie’s job, I would have appreciated it to be lighter. 

Moreover, it has an angled scoop that effectively directs the balls into the pocket when hit at the top. There are also two screw holes in the throat, which is small but adds stability. Hence, it’s a perfect combination of quality and performance. 

Pros

• • Weather resistant and doesn’t warp

• • Enduro Foam construction

• • Smooth throat for better hand placement

Cons

• • Bulky design

• • Stiff pocket

As mentioned above, the StringKing Mark 2F was in my final two choices for which faceoff head to buy. If this head was just slightly more offset, I probably would have gone with it.

The Mark 2F is also what I’ve found most elite college and high school players to be using as of late.

Much like the Weapon X, it has great warp resistance, many stringing holes, and a scoop that makes groundballs a breeze.

One of my favorite features of this head is how thin the plastic is. This makes it really easy to flex your head under your opponent’s sidewall to grab the ball and drag it out.

And even though the plastic is really thin, this head is super durable and warp resistant. Much like the Weapon X, it snaps back into place very well after every faceoff—making it another great option for playing offense after facing off.

When you first get this head, it may take some getting used to and breaking in since it doesn’t crush down on the ball quite as well as the Weapon X and Nike CEO. For some players, it may seem to resist flexing in the way you are used to.

Overall, this is a great choice for both FOGOs and FOSOs, as shown by how many top college faceoff guys use it. I was very close to choosing this head and am sure I would be happy with it if it’s the route I decided to go.

Pros:

• • Very light

• • Great warp resistance

• • Good offensive performance

• • Many stringing holes

• • Shortened throat

• • Thin profile helps it get under other heads while facing off

Cons:

• • Does not face flex well

• • Takes time to break in

After all of my research, I ended up buying the ECD Weapon X primarily due to its performance on offense and warp resistance. 

My final two were the Weapon X and the StringKing Mark 2F, but the Weapon X’s full offset was the deciding factor. I carry the ball a lot for my teams and regularly initiate the offense, so having a head with a full offset gives me better hold and a release that I’m used to. 

It’s worth noting that the offset may take some getting used to when facing off if you are used to faceoff heads that have little-to-no offset.

Aside from the offensive capabilities, this is an amazing head for faceoffs. It does take some time to break in, but once you do, it will flex in almost any way you want. 

A lot of this, as well as the warp resistance, can be attributed to the asymmetrical sidewalls which help the bottom sidewall flex up into the ball while the top collapses down.

The FlexForm plastic helps the head snap back into shape after every faceoff. Compared some other options such as the CEO and Burn FO, this head doesn’t warp easily and is much more durable over time. 

You won’t have to worry about trying to pass and shoot with a crooked head which is really important.

Pros:

• • Great for offense

• • Full offset

• • Great warp resistance

• • Has throat plug

• • Many stringing holes

• • Amazing scoop

Cons:

• • Heavier than some alternatives

• • Takes time to break in

The Nike CEO wasn’t designed to be a faceoff head. Originally Nike designed it to be used by attackmen who prefer a very tight pinch. It just turned out that the sidewall design made this an amazing head for facing off, and since it came out, it has been the most popular faceoff head since the OG Blade.  

The design of the sidewall struts allows this head to collapse down on itself, creating great face flex allowing faceoff men to securely pinch the ball in the throat even if the rest of the head bends backwards.

If you are a pure FOGO who doesn’t have to worry about playing much offense, this is one of the best options. The way the head flexes and grabs the ball is unmatched—and is the reason why it has become one of the most popular faceoff heads of all time.

On the downside, this head warps… A LOT and isn’t very durable. The top of the head will quickly start bending forward (meaning the scoop will be more forward than the throat) and to the side. This makes it really hard to use on offense and you may have to worry about it being illegal.

Overall, if you are just looking for a head to faceoff with, the CEO is undoubtedly one of the best choices. Just be prepared to constantly bend the head back into shape and buy replacements once the head inevitably breaks or becomes warped beyond use.

Pros:

• • One of the most popular faceoff heads of all time

• • Very flexible

• • Best face flex of any head

• • Great for “grabbing” balls in 50/50s

Cons:

• • Warps very easily, making it hard to use on offense

• • Breaks easily

• • Doesn’t have shortened throat

Released in 2024, Warrior Burn Formula is one of the best lacrosse heads for faceoff and offense. I have been using it for a while and this head offers the smoothest exits during the draws. 

Although the sidewalls are flexible, the scoop is pretty stiff. The slightly curved scoop keeps the ball tight when pulling from the scrum. The ball rolls smoothly into the pocket without any awkward bobbles. 

On the other hand, the shorter throat design keeps the ball secure while cradling until I am ready to attack. Thus, it gave me an edge around strong forward opponents and scrappy ground ball battles. 

Sidewalls also have plenty of holes to create a mid-low pocket. The grip on the pocket area provides an extra sense of control. When the ball is pinched inside, it doesn’t feel like wobbling or at risk of getting checked out. 

However, the material is completely similar to its predecessor. So, you will face some wear and tears at the top string region. Shooting speed is also average compared to other attack heads.

Pros

• • Flexible sidewalls to win loose draws

• • Aggressive scoop design for easy ground ball pick-ups

• • Pocket friendly

Cons

• • The top strings were torn out early

• • Average shooting speed

STX has taken a unique approach with the X-IT Flex lacrosse head, specifically designed to meet the demands of face-off specialists. With few options on the market that balance flexibility and warp resistance, I was eager to put this head to the test after using it for over a month. 

The question remains: does the X-IT Flex deliver quick and controlled exits as STX claims? Let’s dive into the details.

Weighing in at an undisclosed weight, the X-IT Flex is tailored for face-off and stay-on midfielders. Its mid-pocket location allows for quick ball release, while the extremely flexible design offers a unique feel that sets it apart from traditional heads. 

With four top string holes and an impressive 28 sidewall holes, this head provides ample customization options to suit individual preferences.

In terms of shooting accuracy, the X-IT Flex performs admirably. The mid pocket and angled sidewalls enable precise ball release without spreading on passes, making it effective for short-range shots. 

However, its flexible build does limit its effectiveness during checking situations; the head often loses shape under intense pressure, which can be a drawback for players who rely on strong checks.

Ball security is a strong point for the X-IT Flex. The mid-pocket design locks the ball in place, providing excellent control during dodging and close cradling. Catching quick feeds is also reliable, especially after the break-in period, as the flexible design helps secure the ball effectively.

Ground ball pickups are smooth thanks to the rounded scoop design, which guides the ball cleanly into the pocket without requiring extreme angle adjustments. This feature is particularly beneficial during face-offs, where control and quick retrieval are essential. The X-IT Flex excels in this area, offering impressive performance for face-off specialists.

It’s a good option for face-off specialists and stay-on midfielders, providing a great balance of accuracy, durability, and control.

Pros

• • Shorter throat design for better control

• • Multi-angle flexibility for quicker break-in

• • Lightweight and highly durable reflex plastic

• • Ample stringing options for customization

Cons

• • Uneven string hole patterns

• • Less effective for delivering strong checks

The ECD Weapon X 2.0 marks the second iteration of the Weapon X series, following its predecessor from 2019. ECD has consistently focused on performance when engineering their heads, so I was eager to add this model to my collection and provide an in-depth review. 

Face-off heads often struggle with balancing flexibility and durability, so I tested the Weapon X 2.0 rigorously over two weeks to see if it truly delivers on both fronts.

Weighing in at 5.15 ounces, the Weapon X 2.0 is designed specifically for face-off players. Its low to mid-low pocket location allows for quick ball releases, while its flexible design aims to enhance performance during clamps. 

With six top string holes and 14 sidewall holes, the head offers a decent range of customization options for pocket setups.

In terms of shooting accuracy, the Weapon X 2.0 performs well, particularly with its hybrid-flex design that supports quick and accurate ball releases. The head’s profile aids in maintaining solid shooting performance for mid-low pocket setups, although some hooking can occur on hard outside shots. 

While it excels in face-off scenarios, it may not be the best choice for players focused on long-distance shooting due to its average shooting speed.

Catching and cradling are also strong points for this head. The rounded scoop improves catching consistency, even under defensive pressure, while the flexible design allows for a secure hold during transitions. 

However, players may find it challenging to cradle securely immediately after winning a face-off, especially with a loose or low pocket setup.

The checking performance of the Weapon X 2.0 is decent but not exceptional. Its lightweight construction allows for agility, but it lacks the stiffness needed for delivering powerful checks effectively. The flexible sidewalls absorb some impact but may not provide enough resistance during aggressive defensive plays.

Ground ball pickups are where the Weapon X 2.0 truly shines. The rounded scoop design allows for smooth and quick pickups from various angles, minimizing drag during scrums. This feature is particularly beneficial during face-offs, where control and speed are crucial.

It’s a good choice for face-off specialists looking for a head that balances flexibility and durability while providing optimal ground pickup performance.

Pros

• • Durable flex foam construction

• • Lightweight design

• • Engineered flex points for better control during clamps

• • Two variants available for different flexibility needs

Cons

Spread on long-distance shots

Average shooting speed

Not stiff enough for powerful checks